| Literature / Poetry / Human Nature / Free Verse | ©2012-2013 ~exactlywhatiseem |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
On the other hand though, I do live in fear of that one person with a little too much correcting-gusto, who finds the singular mistake and pounces on it with that kind of mad, ravenous triumph. There are few things more muse-crushing than a thoughtful piece being hammered to death by a thoughtless grammar-enthusiast.
This is aimed for the "Why check? Who cares?" mindset, not a few errors. They happen sometimes, even with the best editing.
It isn't endearing, and it is almost always detrimental to a piece.
I think you're talking about the way it's worded. I agree; vicious wording is nowhere near helpful, even if the message is. I don't think being thorough is a bad thing in and of itself.
Perhaps that is true. I do believe that criticism, although sometimes difficult to take, really is important in furthering one's abilities - And it does make all the difference, whether that criticism is put forth in a constructive way, or that kind of loud-mouth holier-than-thou way, which is most unpleasant.
I thought it was just my luck at first, but I suppose it is.
I've never experienced any of the second sort in my little corner of obscurity. I'm glad I haven't.
I wouldn't blame someone for putting aside such criticism. It doesn't seem helpful and I would end up wondering about the intent behind it. It might also lead to motivation? I guess it depends.
The first is definitely a better option.
That being said, I do appreciate why you chose to write in that format. It would be like drawing a stick-figure and claiming it the Mona Lisa. I don't understand why people do that.
I know; the idea may be there, but the execution is not its best.